Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-18 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C5 is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno2, with a score of 76.4 against 73.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy C5 has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy C5 is an notably older cellphone than the OPPO Reno2, but Samsung was able to build it thinner and notably lighter.
The OPPO Reno2 features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy C5, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno2 also has 4 GB more RAM. OPPO Reno2 features a slightly better screen than Galaxy C5, because although it has a bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display.
The OPPO Reno2 takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy C5, because it has a back camera with way more megapixels, a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments and a way better video quality. OPPO Reno2 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C5, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Reno2 features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy C5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.