Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-18 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C7 has a score of 77.7, which is a bit better than the OPPO Reno2's overall score of 73.9. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy C7 has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10. Galaxy C7's construction is notably thinner and lighter than the OPPO Reno2, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The OPPO Reno2 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a quite larger screen, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little greater count of pixels per inch of screen. The OPPO Reno2 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C7, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno2 also has more RAM.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy C7, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a much higher video quality and a camera in the back with a much better resolution. OPPO Reno2 features a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy C7, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB and 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno2 features longer battery life than Galaxy C7, because it has a 21% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.