Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is much better than OPPO Reno2, having an 88.1 score against 73.9. Galaxy F62 is a heavier phone than the OPPO Reno2, but both are equally thin. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, counting with some extra features and optimized performance.
Galaxy F62 counts with a little more vivid screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little bit lower pixel number per inch of display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a bit larger display. OPPO Reno2 counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Galaxy F62 counts with a processor that's just as good as the CPU in OPPO Reno2, although the Galaxy F62 has less CPU cores (although faster) and 2 GB lesser RAM memory. The Galaxy F62 has a slightly better camera than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a larger sensor taking better quality pictures and a lot higher 64 MP resolution back camera.
The Galaxy F62 has a much better battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.