Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is way better than OPPO Reno2's overall score of 73.9. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold and the OPPO Reno2 were released with only 1 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Fold body is incredibly heavier but also much thinner than the OPPO Reno2. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, so it provides you a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno2 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno2, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB more internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno2 captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit superior battery duration than OPPO Reno2, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.