Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno2's general score of 73.9. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS. The Galaxy M20 design is just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the OPPO Reno2, even though both of them were only released with a few months difference.
The OPPO Reno2 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno2 also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno2 features a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite inferior amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The OPPO Reno2 features a much better camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The OPPO Reno2 has a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the OPPO Reno2 also has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy M20 features improved battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.