Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has a global score of 82.4, which is better than OPPO Reno2's overall score of 73.9. Samsung Galaxy M30 is a just a little bit lighter and thinner cellphone than the OPPO Reno2, although both were only released with a few months difference. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features.
The OPPO Reno2 has a little sharper display than Galaxy M30, because it has a just a bit better pixels amount per display inch, a little bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger screen. The OPPO Reno2 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB, the OPPO Reno2 also has 128 GB more internal storage.
The OPPO Reno2 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno2 also has more RAM. Galaxy M30 counts with greater battery lifetime than OPPO Reno2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Reno2 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.