Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a global score of 90.8, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno2's 73.9 global score. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 is just a bit heavier than OPPO Reno2, it's thinner and also newer. Galaxy Note 20 features a little faster processor than OPPO Reno2. Both have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
Galaxy Note 20 and OPPO Reno2 both have incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bit bigger screen. OPPO Reno2 captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels, a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations and faster 30 fps video frame rate.
The OPPO Reno2 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno2, because it has an 8% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.