Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno2's score of 73.9. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10. Even though the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is just a little bit heavier than OPPO Reno2, it's thinner and also newer.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than OPPO Reno2, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger screen and a just a little greater amount of pixels in each inch of screen. OPPO Reno2 has a greater storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better camera than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better resolution back camera, a way larger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little better battery duration than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.