Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno2's 73.9 overall score. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has older 5.0 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno2, despite of the fact that it was released 6 years before.
The Galaxy Note 3 and OPPO Reno2 have really similar processors, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Galaxy Note 3 has a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno2, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a little bit worse pixels quantity per display inch.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also has a lot bigger aperture, a much larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Reno2 has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.