Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is better than the OPPO Reno2's global score of 73.9. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, so it provides you some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is just a little bit heavier but just a little bit thinner than OPPO Reno2, and both were released only a few months apart.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little bit better processing power than OPPO Reno2, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a display that's very similar to OPPO Reno2's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little bit less pixels per display inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The OPPO Reno2 has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a SD card slot that supports 488 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a bit superior battery life than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
OPPO Reno2 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a much larger sensor shooting lot better quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.