Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a global score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than OPPO Reno2's general score of 73.9. Samsung Galaxy Note3's design is thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno2, although it was released many years before. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10.
OPPO Reno2 features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a little more pixels per inch of screen, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit bigger screen. The OPPO Reno2 features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM and 4 more processing cores.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. OPPO Reno2 takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Reno2 also has a lot larger camera sensor, a way larger aperture to take better low light images and video and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
OPPO Reno2 counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.