Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than OPPO Reno2, getting a global score of 79.5 against 73.9. The Galaxy Note7 construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno2, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The OPPO Reno2 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Reno2 features a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note7, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Reno2 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The OPPO Reno2 counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno2 also has a camera with way more megapixels and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.