Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is much better than OPPO Reno2's 73.9 score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, giving a couple nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S10 is a lighter and somewhat thinner phone than OPPO Reno2, even when both were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a little better processing power than OPPO Reno2. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Galaxy S10 has a little sharper screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos and a way more megapixels back camera.
OPPO Reno2 has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB, the OPPO Reno2 also has more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno2 counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.