Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than OPPO Reno2, having a 93.6 score against 73.9. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, providing some extra features. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and OPPO Reno2 were released only a couple of months apart, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design is somewhat thinner but also just a bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit sharper display than OPPO Reno2, because it has a just a little better screen pixel density, a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a quite larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than OPPO Reno2. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM.
OPPO Reno2 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have the same 256 GB internal memory, the OPPO Reno2 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Reno2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The OPPO Reno2 captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photos and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.