Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than the OPPO Reno2, having an 86.3 score against 73.9. Although Galaxy S10e and OPPO Reno2 were released only 7 months apart, Galaxy S10e is somewhat thinner and notably lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a bit sharper display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a little better pixel amount per inch of screen.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB, the OPPO Reno2 also has 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little better performance than OPPO Reno2, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The OPPO Reno2 takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos.
The OPPO Reno2 counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.