Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is much better than OPPO Reno2's global score of 73.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, offering a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy S20 construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than OPPO Reno2, even though both of them were released only 5 months apart.
The Galaxy S20 has a little bit better performance than OPPO Reno2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S20 features a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The OPPO Reno2 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations, a lot more mega pixels back camera and faster 30 fps video frame rate.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S20, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Reno2 and the Samsung Galaxy S20 both count with really similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.