Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is way better than OPPO Reno2's 73.9 overall score. The Galaxy S20 FE construction is newer and thinner than OPPO Reno2's, but it's also just a little heavier. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has a newer 11 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little sharper display than OPPO Reno2. Both of them have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the same pixels density and a same size display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit faster CPU than OPPO Reno2, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The OPPO Reno2 features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S20 FE has just a little better battery life than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The OPPO Reno2 captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality photos and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography in low light situations and a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.