Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than OPPO Reno2, getting a 98 score against 73.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G and the OPPO Reno2 were released with only a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G construction is just a little thinner but somewhat heavier than the OPPO Reno2. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features and increased performance.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better display than OPPO Reno2, because it has a greater pixels density, a little larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. OPPO Reno2 has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Reno2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has better battery life than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots much clearer pictures and videos than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same sensor size, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.