Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has an overall score of 93.4, which is a lot better than the OPPO Reno2's score of 73.9. Samsung Galaxy S22's design is much newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the OPPO Reno2. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features.
Galaxy S22 features a much more vibrant screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count per display inch. The OPPO Reno2 features a very superior memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S22 has a bit better processing unit than OPPO Reno2. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. OPPO Reno2 features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has an 8% greater battery size. Galaxy S22 shoots slightly better videos and photos than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images, it also counts with a back camera with more megapixels, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.