Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the OPPO Reno2, getting a global score of 95.4 against 73.9. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is heavier than the OPPO Reno2, it's a little bit thinner and much newer. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno2. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and 8 GB of RAM. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better looking display than OPPO Reno2, because it has a just a bit higher pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bigger display.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior camera than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a camera in the back with much more MP.
OPPO Reno2 features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with better battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.