Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than the OPPO Reno2, having a 75.8 score against 73.9. The Galaxy S7 Active is a noticeably older and a little thicker phone than the OPPO Reno2, but Samsung could make it just a little lighter anyway. The OPPO Reno2 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cpu cores.
Galaxy S7 Active has a brighter display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. OPPO Reno2 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The OPPO Reno2 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy S7 Active's battery performance is just as good as OPPO Reno2's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.