Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-18 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is much better than the OPPO Reno2, with an 81.9 score against 73.9. Even being the best we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is an a lot older, just a little thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno2. Galaxy S8 Active's processing unit is just as good as OPPO Reno2's processor, and although the Galaxy S8 Active has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a bit better looking display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. The OPPO Reno2 takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno2 also has a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a camera with a much better resolution.
The OPPO Reno2 has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 192 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a battery life that's just as good as OPPO Reno2's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.