Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the OPPO Reno2, getting an 80.1 score against 73.9. Even being the best we compare here, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is way heavier and a lot thicker than OPPO Reno2. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior processor than OPPO Reno2, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid screen than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
OPPO Reno2 has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the OPPO Reno2 also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better battery duration than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
OPPO Reno2 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking images and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution, a way larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.