Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than OPPO Reno2's global score of 73.9. Although it's the best cellphone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is a bit thicker and heavier than the OPPO Reno2. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Reno2 and the Galaxy XCover Pro feature quite similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a screen that's just as good as OPPO Reno2's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher number of pixels in each screen inch.
The OPPO Reno2 features a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno2 also has a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera. OPPO Reno2 counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the OPPO Reno2 also has 192 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.