Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than OPPO Reno2's 73.9 score. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, providing you a lot of extra features and a performance increase. The Galaxy Z Flip is a just a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than OPPO Reno2, even when both of them were only released with a few months difference.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better display than OPPO Reno2, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite larger display. Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno2. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno2 has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the OPPO Reno2 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The OPPO Reno2 takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a larger camera aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back camera with a way better resolution.
The OPPO Reno2 features longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.