Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than OPPO Reno2, having an 85.6 score against 73.9. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a newer 11 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, so it gives a couple additional features and better performance. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and way thinner than OPPO Reno2.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little faster processing unit than OPPO Reno2. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno2, because it has a quite larger display, a little greater screen density and a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution.
The OPPO Reno2 features a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a lot more megapixels camera and a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations. OPPO Reno2 has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB more internal storage.
The OPPO Reno2 features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.