Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than OPPO Reno2, getting a 92.3 score against 73.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is newer, much thinner and a little bit lighter than OPPO Reno2. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has newer 11 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, offering some extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno2. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno2, because it has a little bit greater display pixels density, a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636.
OPPO Reno2 features a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory, the OPPO Reno2 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. OPPO Reno2 has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% more battery capacity.
The OPPO Reno2 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality pictures, a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.