Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is way better than the OPPO Reno2's global score of 73.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is newer and thinner than the OPPO Reno2's, although it's also extremely heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the newer 11 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version, providing you lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little better performance than OPPO Reno2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno2 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 feature incredibly similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little inferior pixel count in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a higher 1768 x 2208px resolution and a bigger display.
OPPO Reno2 has much more memory for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the OPPO Reno2 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better battery life than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
OPPO Reno2 captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.