Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is way better than OPPO Reno2's overall score of 73.9. Although Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way heavier than the OPPO Reno2, it's incredibly thinner and also newer. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better processor than OPPO Reno2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno2 counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density.
The OPPO Reno2 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger aperture. The OPPO Reno2 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory capacity, the OPPO Reno2 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better battery duration than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.