Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a global score of 82.9, which is better than OPPO Reno2's score of 73.9. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has the newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10 version. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro body is just a bit thinner but just a little heavier than the OPPO Reno2, and both of them were released only a few months apart.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a little sharper screen than OPPO Reno2, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, a just a bit lower pixel quantity per display inch and a quite smaller display. OPPO Reno2 features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a little bit better processing power than OPPO Reno2. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a little bit better camera than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, and they both have the same back camera sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same resolution camera in the back, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a battery duration that is just as good as the OPPO Reno2 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.