Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a global score of 90.1, which is way better than the OPPO Reno2's 73.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should provide the same OS features. Even being the best phone we compare here, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro construction is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than OPPO Reno2.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little faster processor than OPPO Reno2. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno2, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels, a bit better pixel amount in each display inch and a little bigger screen.
OPPO Reno2 counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the OPPO Reno2 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features longer battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.