Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is much better than OPPO Reno2, getting an 84.3 score against 73.9. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is somewhat heavier than OPPO Reno2, it's way thinner and also extremely newer. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a newer 14 version while OPPO Reno2 has Android 10, giving you some nice extra features and increased performance.
The OPPO Reno2 has a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a way better looking display than OPPO Reno2, because it has a larger display, a much better 2224 x 2488 resolution and a little bit higher display pixel density.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a little bit better camera than OPPO Reno2, and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 also has a way higher video definition, a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back camera with a better 50 mega pixels resolution.
OPPO Reno2 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity, the OPPO Reno2 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features longer battery performance than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.