Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.34 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is much better than OPPO Reno2's 73.9 score. Although Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro and OPPO Reno2 were released only 7 months apart, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro construction is a little thinner but somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better display than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a quite worse pixels count in each inch of display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also counts with a little larger display. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than OPPO Reno2, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The OPPO Reno2 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots much better photos and videos than OPPO Reno2, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno2, because it has an 18 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.