Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-18 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.67 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Luminous black, Ocean blue and Sunset pink | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.55 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a bit better than OPPO Reno2, getting a global score of 79 against 73.9. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S and the OPPO Reno2 were released with only 6 months difference, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S body is just a little heavier but also just a bit thinner than the OPPO Reno2. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a more recent 11 version and OPPO Reno2 has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a CPU that is just as good as OPPO Reno2's processor, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has 4 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. OPPO Reno2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno2 also counts with a quite better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S's camera is just as good as OPPO Reno2's camera, and although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light images, they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, the same resolution camera, the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates.
OPPO Reno2 features a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the OPPO Reno2 also has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with improved battery duration than OPPO Reno2, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.