Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-03-03 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has an overall score of 93.3, which is a lot better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 general score. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's body is newer and just a bit thinner than OPPO Reno3 Pro's, but it's heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with Android 10 operating system.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a better performing processing unit than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has just a bit better screen than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same screen brightness, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little bit greater screen density.
IPhone 13 Pro's storage capacity to store more apps and games is just as good as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, both of them have the same internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a greater camera than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features longer battery performance than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 3095mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.