Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 949.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus is way better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, getting a general score of 87.1 against 72. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus construction is a bit thinner than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it's somewhat heavier and was released 3 years before. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a way brighter display, a larger display and a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a bit better processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 8 Plus features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity instead of 2691mAh. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a camera in the back with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.