Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 88.1 score against 72. Even though the Apple iPhone X is notably older than OPPO Reno3 Pro, it's design is a bit thinner and a bit lighter. The Apple iPhone X has a little faster processing unit than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 5 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little inferior count of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a lot brighter screen and a bit larger screen. The iPhone X has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than iPhone X, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much longer battery life than iPhone X, because it has a 48 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.