Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having an 82 score against 72. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the iPhone XR is an older, a little thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno3 Pro. The iPhone XR counts with a greater performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a much better screen than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a better display density, way more brightness and a little larger display. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos and a lot higher resolution back facing camera.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.