Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 global score. IPhone XS is an older and just a little heavier phone than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but Apple was able to make it a little bit thinner anyway. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little sharper display than iPhone XS, because although it has a quite lower display density and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display and a much brighter screen.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. IPhone XS features a quite better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because although it has less CPU cores (but faster) and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a superior battery life than iPhone XS, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than iPhone XS, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.