Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Google Pixel's body is lighter than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it's just a bit thicker and was released many years before. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a sharper screen than Google Pixel, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a very superior camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
The Google Pixel's memory to install games and applications is just as good as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, they have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.