Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a global score of 82.5, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's score of 72. The Google Pixel 2 XL is a a little thinner phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but both of them weight the same. The Google Pixel 2 XL and OPPO Reno3 Pro feature quite similar processors, and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has 4 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a little lower pixels density and a way lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display. The Google Pixel 2 XL's storage for games and applications is just as good as OPPO Reno3 Pro's one, they have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity against 3520mAh. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a very superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.