Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Google Pixel 3's design is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it was released around 17 months before. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger screen.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 2915mAh. OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a same size diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.