Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, with an 80.7 score against 72. Google Pixel 3 XL is an older and a little bit heavier phone than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but Google made it just a bit thinner anyway. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little better performance than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a quite worse pixel amount in each inch of screen and a lot worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a much larger sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro has just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 17% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.