Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 overall score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version. The Google Pixel 3a construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bigger screen.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 34% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.