Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Black, Purple and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a XL has the newer 11 version and OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10. The Google Pixel 3a XL construction has the same thickness than OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it's just a little lighter.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a just a little higher pixel number per screen inch. The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity. OPPO Reno3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.