Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro's global score of 72. Google Pixel 4's body has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is a bit lighter. Google Pixel 4 has a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. OPPO Reno3 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 44% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.