Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro, having an 82.9 score against 72. Google Pixel 4 XL's construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is a little heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.