Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having a score of 82.9 against 72. These devices have Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a has newer 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10 version. Google Pixel 4a's construction has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter.
Google Pixel 4a's CPU is very similar to the processor in OPPO Reno3 Pro, and although the Google Pixel 4a has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit worse pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little larger display.
The Google Pixel 4a has as much memory for apps and games as the OPPO Reno3 Pro, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. OPPO Reno3 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
OPPO Reno3 Pro features greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.