Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, having an 87.5 score against 72. These devices work with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while OPPO Reno3 Pro has Android 10, giving some additional features. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design has the same thickness than the OPPO Reno3 Pro, but it is just a bit lighter.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The OPPO Reno3 Pro features a better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a way larger camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the OPPO Reno3 Pro one, both have exactly the same internal memory. The OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.