Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-03 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.25 x 2.89 x 0.32 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Aurora blue, Midnight black and Sky white | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 44.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than OPPO Reno3 Pro's 72 score. Although Google Pixel 5 and the OPPO Reno3 Pro were only released with a couple months difference, Google Pixel 5 is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner. OPPO Reno3 Pro counts with a much better display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels number in each display inch, it also counts with a little larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Google Pixel 5 and OPPO Reno3 Pro feature incredibly similar memory to install games and applications, they have the same internal memory. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit superior CPU than OPPO Reno3 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. OPPO Reno3 Pro has a superior camera than Google Pixel 5, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno3 Pro also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a little bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno3 Pro, because it has a 1% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.